From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dobarganes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 10, 2006
930 So. 2d 765 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D06-424.

May 10, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Daryl Trawick, J.

Enrique M. Dobarganes, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, C.J., and SHEPHERD and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

The defendant argues that the written sentence, which classifies him as a habitual felony offender and a habitual violent felony offender, does not conform with the trial court's oral sentencing pronouncement. Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, see Lundy v. State, 912 So.2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings or for the attachment of record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Dobarganes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 10, 2006
930 So. 2d 765 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Dobarganes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Enrique M. DOBARGANES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 10, 2006

Citations

930 So. 2d 765 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

The First, Second, Third, and Fifth Districts have interpreted this to include an otherwise legal sentence…

Williams v. State

The First, Second, Third, and Fifth Districts have interpreted this to include an otherwise legal sentence…