Opinion
12880-20SL
03-28-2022
ORDER
Diana L. Leyden Special Trial Judge
On February 23, 2022, respondent filed with the Court a Motion for Continuance (motion). Petitioners' views on the granting of the motion are unknown. By Order served February 25, 2022, the Court directed petitioners, on or before March 10, 2022, to file a response to respondent's motion and failure to comply with this Order may result in the granting of respondent's motion. Petitioners failed to respond.
This case was called from the calendar for the remote Trial Session of the Court at San Francisco, California, on March 21, 2022. There was no appearance by or on behalf of petitioners. Counsel for respondent appeared and was heard. Upon due consideration and for cause more fully appearing in the transcript of the proceedings, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Motion for Continuance is granted and this case is continued. It is further
ORDERED that jurisdiction is retained by the undersigned. It is further
ORDERED that, on or before May 20, 2022, respondent shall file a status report informing the Court as to the then-present status of this case.