From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alcan Aluminio do Brasil, S. A. v. Benitez-Allende

U.S.
Feb 21, 1989
489 U.S. 1018 (1989)

Summary

applying state rather than federal law allowing award to be vacated for evident partiality

Summary of this case from Tuco Inc. v. Burlington Northern R.R. Co.

Opinion

No. 88-1077.

February 21, 1989, October TERM, 1988.


C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 857 F. 2d 26.


Summaries of

Alcan Aluminio do Brasil, S. A. v. Benitez-Allende

U.S.
Feb 21, 1989
489 U.S. 1018 (1989)

applying state rather than federal law allowing award to be vacated for evident partiality

Summary of this case from Tuco Inc. v. Burlington Northern R.R. Co.
Case details for

Alcan Aluminio do Brasil, S. A. v. Benitez-Allende

Case Details

Full title:ALCAN ALUMINIO DO BRASIL, S. A., ET AL. v. BENITEZ-ALLENDE ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 21, 1989

Citations

489 U.S. 1018 (1989)

Citing Cases

Tuco Inc. v. Burlington Northern R.R. Co.

The FAA does not dictate any particular form or procedural rules of arbitration different from those agreed…

Vermeulen v. Renault, U.S.A. Inc.

First, the fact that title to the Renault vehicles passed to AMSC in France rather than in the United States…