From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DNA Genotek Inc. v. Spectrum Sols.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Mar 30, 2022
3:21-cv-00516-JO-AGS (S.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00516-JO-AGS

03-30-2022

DNA GENOTEK INC, a Canadian corporation, Plaintiff, v. SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS L.L.C., a Utah Limited Liability Company, Defendant. SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS L.L.C., a Utah Limited Liability Company, Counter Claimant, v. DNA GENOTEK INC, a Canadian corporation, Counter Defendant.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF/COUNTER DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Honorable Jinsook Ohta United States District Judge

Plaintiff/Counter Defendant DNA Genotek Inc. ("Genotek") has filed a motion to dismiss Defendant/Counter Claimant Spectrum Solutions L.L.C.'s ("Spectrum") counterclaims of inequitable conduct, monopolization, and attempted monopolization pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and strike the affirmative defenses of inequitable conduct, patent misuse, and unclean hands pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f). Dkt. 41.

The Court held oral argument on March 30, 2022. For the reasons stated on the record during the oral argument, the motion to dismiss the inequitable conduct, monopolization, and attempted monopolization counterclaims is DENIED. The motion to strike is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

DNA Genotek Inc. v. Spectrum Sols.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Mar 30, 2022
3:21-cv-00516-JO-AGS (S.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2022)
Case details for

DNA Genotek Inc. v. Spectrum Sols.

Case Details

Full title:DNA GENOTEK INC, a Canadian corporation, Plaintiff, v. SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Mar 30, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-00516-JO-AGS (S.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2022)