From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DM Vero LLC v. Ohebshalom

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 13, 2021
21 Civ. 2008 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 2008 (ER)

08-13-2021

DM VERO LLC operating as “VERO, ” JUDE DENNIS MAROVIC, and MARKO MATIC, Plaintiffs, v. BENJAMIN OHEBSHALOM, SKY MANAGEMENT, ALLIANCE 77, LLC., and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants.


ORDER

EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within forty-five (45) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next forty-five (45) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

DM Vero LLC v. Ohebshalom

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 13, 2021
21 Civ. 2008 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2021)
Case details for

DM Vero LLC v. Ohebshalom

Case Details

Full title:DM VERO LLC operating as “VERO, ” JUDE DENNIS MAROVIC, and MARKO MATIC…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 13, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 2008 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2021)