D.M. v. Cnty. of Merced

10 Citing cases

  1. Hipschman v. Cnty. of San Diego

    3:22-cv-0903 AJB (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2024)

    District courts have broad discretion to determine relevancy for discovery purposes. D.M. v. County of Merced, 2022 WL 229865, at * 2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002) and Surfvivor Media v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005)). District courts also have broad discretion to limit discovery to prevent its abuse.

  2. Orbian Corp. v. Houston

    24CV1014-W(BLM) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2024)

    District courts have broad discretion to determine relevancy for discovery purposes. D.M. v. County of Merced, 2022 WL 229865, at * 2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002) and Surfvivor Media v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005)). District courts also have broad discretion to limit discovery to prevent its abuse.

  3. Garcia v. Navy Fed. Credit Union

    23CV2017-MMA(BLM) (S.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2024)

    District courts have broad discretion to determine relevancy for discovery purposes. D.M. v. County of Merced, 2022 WL 229865, at * 2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing) Hallett, 296 F.3d at 751 and Surfvivor Media v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005). District courts also have broad discretion to limit discovery to prevent its abuse.

  4. Renn v. Otay Lakes Brewery, LLC

    23CV1139-GPC (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2024)

    District courts have broad discretion to determine relevancy for discovery purposes. D.M. v. County of Merced, 2022 WL 229865, at * 2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002) and Surfvivor Media v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005)). District courts also have broad discretion to limit discovery to prevent its abuse.

  5. Hipschman v. Cnty. of San Diego

    22-cv-903-AJB-BLM (S.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2024)

    District courts have broad discretion to determine relevancy for discovery purposes. D.M. v. County of Merced, 2022 WL 229865, at * 2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002) and Surfvivor Media v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005)). District courts also have broad discretion to limit discovery to prevent its abuse.

  6. Lua v. McNett

    23CV32-JAH(BLM) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    District courts have broad discretion to determine relevancy for discovery purposes. D.M. v. County of Merced, 2022 WL 229865, at * 2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002) and Surfvivor Media v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005)). District courts also have broad discretion to limit discovery to prevent its abuse.

  7. Woodway U.S. v. LifeCORE Fitness, Inc.

    22CV492-JO (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2024)

    District courts have broad discretion to determine relevancy for discovery purposes. D.M. v. County of Merced, 2022 WL 229865, at * 2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002) and Surfvivor Media v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005)). District courts also have broad discretion to limit discovery to prevent its abuse.

  8. Garcia v. Wal-Mart Assocs.

    18cv0500-L-MDD (S.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2023)

    District courts have broad discretion to determine relevancy for discovery purposes. D.M. v. County of Merced, No. 1:20cv00409-JLT-SAB, 2022 WL 229865, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002) and Survivor Media v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005)).

  9. United States Aviation Underwriters Inc. v. Aerospike Iron, LLC

    21CV758-GPC(BLM) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2022)

    District courts have broad discretion to determine relevancy for discovery purposes. D.M. v. County of Merced, 2022 WL 229865, at * 2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002) and Surfvivor Media v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005)). District courts also have broad discretion to limit discovery to prevent its abuse.

  10. Yphantides v. Cnty. of San Diego

    21cv1575-GPC(BLM) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2022)   Cited 6 times

    District courts have broad discretion to determine relevancy for discovery purposes. D.M. v. County of Merced, No. 20cv409-JLT-SAB, 2022 WL 229865, at * 2 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002) and Surfvivor Media v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005)).