Dixon v. Gage Corporation of Delaware

Full title: DONALD R. DIXON, Plaintiff, v. THE GAGE CORPORATION OF DELAWARE, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 20, 2007

No. 07-10534 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 20, 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-10534.

November 20, 2007

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

R. WHALEN, Magistrate Judge

For the reasons stated on the record on November 20, 2007, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint [Docket #10] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:

As to Count II of the proposed First Amended Complaint (Breach of Contract — Wrongful Discharge), the motion is GRANTED.¹

1 Count I of the first amended complaint is the same breach of contract claim raised in the original complaint.

As to Count III (Stock Redemption Agreement), the motion is DENIED.

As to Count IV (Michigan Business Corporation Act), the motion is GRANTED.

As to Count V (Violation of Shareholder's Rights), the motion is GRANTED except as to the allegations in ¶ 43(b), and as to that paragraph, DENIED.

As to Count VI (Unjust Enrichment), the motion is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.