Opinion
No. 293 CA 22-01423
03-17-2023
HANDELMAN, WITKOWICZ & LEVITSKY, ROCHESTER (MARTIN S HANDELMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. GALLO & IACOVANGELO, LLP, ROCHESTER (CRAIG D. CHARTIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
HANDELMAN, WITKOWICZ & LEVITSKY, ROCHESTER (MARTIN S HANDELMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
GALLO & IACOVANGELO, LLP, ROCHESTER (CRAIG D. CHARTIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, BANNISTER, MONTOUR, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Christopher S. Ciaccio, A.J.), entered October 25, 2021. The order granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied the cross motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.