From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Warden

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 7, 2021
20-05846 EJD (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)

Opinion

20-05846 EJD (PR)

12-07-2021

DAMON L. DIXON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

EDWARD J. DAVILA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his state sentence. Dkt. No. 1. On October 12, 2021, the Court dismissed the petition with leave to amend, for Petitioner to file an amended petition that states a cognizable claim challenging the voluntary and intelligence character of his plea and the nature of the advice of counsel to plead. Dkt. No. 15 at 3. Petitioner was directed to file an amended petition no later than twenty-eight days from the date the order is filed. Id. at 4. Petitioner was advised that failure to file a timely response in accordance with the order would result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. Id.

The deadline to file an amended petition, i.e., November 9, 2021, has long since passed without any further communication from Petitioner. Accordingly, this action is DSIMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Warden

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 7, 2021
20-05846 EJD (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Dixon v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:DAMON L. DIXON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 7, 2021

Citations

20-05846 EJD (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)