From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jun 10, 2003
108 S.W.3d 123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81660

June 10, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Honorable Michael P. David.

Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Charnette D. Douglass, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, C.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Robert R. Dowd, J.



ORDER


Elbert Dixon ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant raises three points claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the motion court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

MOONEY, C.J., CRAHAN, J., and DOWD J. concurring.


Summaries of

Dixon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jun 10, 2003
108 S.W.3d 123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Dixon v. State

Case Details

Full title:ELBERT DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Jun 10, 2003

Citations

108 S.W.3d 123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Dixon v. Dwyer

On June 10, 2003, the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Petitioner's post-conviction relief.…