From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. State

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Jul 13, 1988
528 So. 2d 832 (Miss. 1988)

Summary

holding circuit court should have granted Dixon's motion to amend his appearance bond

Summary of this case from Ray v. State

Opinion

No. 57979.

July 13, 1988.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Monroe County, Frank A. Russell, J..

Randolph Walker, Walker Turner, West Point, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman and Mike Moore, Attys. Gen., by Billy L. Gore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before HAWKINS, P.J., and SULLIVAN and ZUCCARO, JJ.


Cliff Dixon was convicted for petit larceny in justice court in Monroe County and fined $50 on June 10, 1983. He duly noticed his appeal to the circuit court and filed an appearance bond in the amount of $250. Dixon signed the bond, but no signatures of sureties appear on the bond. The bond was approved, however, by the justice court judge.

After appeal time had run, the State moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, in that the bond did not comport with the requirements of § 99-35-3, Miss. Code Ann. (1972). The circuit judge granted the State's motion, denying an ore tenus motion by Dixon to amend the bond. Aggrieved, Dixon appeals, arguing that the lower court erred in dismissing his bond. We agree, and reverse the decision of the circuit court to deny Dixon time to amend his bond. Here, the bond, though imperfect, was filed and approved by the justice court judge. The circuit court, upon Dixon's request, should have granted him a hearing and an opportunity to correct any deficiencies. See, Smith v. Boykin, 61 Miss. 10 (1883).

We reverse and remand to the circuit court for reinstatement of Dixon's appeal to that court. Dixon is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this opinion in which to tender proper bond, failing which his appeal will be properly dismissed.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., DAN M. LEE, P.J., and PRATHER, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON, GRIFFIN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dixon v. State

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Jul 13, 1988
528 So. 2d 832 (Miss. 1988)

holding circuit court should have granted Dixon's motion to amend his appearance bond

Summary of this case from Ray v. State

holding circuit court should have granted Dixon's motion to amend his appearance bond

Summary of this case from Ray v. State

In Dixon v. State, 528 So.2d 832, 832–33 (Miss.1988), the Mississippi Supreme Court held that the circuit court should have granted a defendant's motion to amend his appearance bond, which had been filed without the signatures of the sureties.

Summary of this case from Ray v. State

In Dixon, the supreme court found that the circuit court should have granted Dixon time to amend his deficient bond. Dixon, 528 So.2d at 832-33.

Summary of this case from Hill v. City of Wiggins

In Dixon, the appellant, appealing from a conviction in the Justice Court of Monroe County, signed and filed an appearance bond, but the bond did not contain the signatures of any sureties. Dixon, 528 So.2d at 832.

Summary of this case from Riley v. Town of Lambert
Case details for

Dixon v. State

Case Details

Full title:Cliff DIXON v. STATE of Mississippi

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi

Date published: Jul 13, 1988

Citations

528 So. 2d 832 (Miss. 1988)

Citing Cases

Riley v. Town of Lambert

¶ 12. The dissent, citing Dixon v. State, 528 So.2d 832 (Miss. 1988), Mitchell v. Parker, 804 So.2d 1066,…

Hill v. City of Wiggins

¶ 9. To further support his argument, Hill points us to Dixon v. State, 528 So.2d 832, 832-33 (Miss. 1988),…