From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. San Francisco Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Oct 31, 2011
No. C 11-05217 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-05217 MEJ

10-31-2011

HOWARD DIXON Plaintiff(s), v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT Defendant(s).


ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application. Upon review of the record in this action, the Court notes that Plaintiff has not filed a written consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. This civil case was randomly assigned to the undersigned magistrate judge for all purposes including trial. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.

You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and disposition. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall inform the Court, by way of the enclosed form, whether he consents to magistrate judge jurisdiction or requests reassignment to a United States District Judge for trial. The consent/declination form shall be filed by November 15, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Maria-Elena James

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

HOWARD DIXON Plaintiff(s),

v.

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT Defendant(s).

No. C 11-05217 MEJ

CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the undersigned party hereby consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in this case, including trial, and order the entry of final judgment, and voluntarily waives the right to proceed before a United States District Judge.

Dated:_

Signed by:_

Counsel for:_

REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The undersigned party hereby declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition, and hereby requests the reassignment of this case to a United States District Judge.

Dated:_

Signed by:_

Counsel for:_

HOWARD DIXON

Plaintiff,

v.

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT Defendant.

Case Number: 11-05217 MEJ

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on October 31, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Howard Dixon

2363 Grande Vista Place

Oakland, CA 94621

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Dixon v. San Francisco Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Oct 31, 2011
No. C 11-05217 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Dixon v. San Francisco Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD DIXON Plaintiff(s), v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-05217 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)