From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Reynolds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Aug 19, 2009
65 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. CAE 09-01604.

August 19, 2009.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered August 6, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to, inter alia, Election Law article 16. The order dismissed the petition.

Bouvier Partnership, Llp, Buffalo (emilio Colaiacovo Of Counsel), For Petitioner-appellant.

Jerome D. Schad, Williamsville, For Respondent-respondent Robert B. Reynolds, Jr., And Cantor, Lukasik, Dolce Panepinto, Buffalo (jerome D. Schad Of Counsel), For Respondents-respondents Sandra J. Rosenswie And Robert C. Vacanti, Purporting To Be The Presiding Officer And Secretary Of A Meeting Of The Executive Committee Of Erie County Independence Party, At Which A Designation Of Candidates Was Made, And Erie County Independence Party.

Jeffrey E. Marion, Williamsville, For Respondents-respondents Michele M. Iannello And Thomas A Loughran, Candidates.

Present: Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Green and Pine, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this special proceeding seeking, inter alia, a determination that the certificates of authorization issued to respondents Robert B. Reynolds, Jr., Michele M. Iannello, and Thomas A. Loughran by the Erie County Independence Party were null and void. The certificates in question authorized those three respondents to run in the Independence Party primary for the position of County Legislator. We agree with Supreme Court that the proceeding is jurisdictionally defective based on petitioner's failure to join the New York State Independence Party (State Party) as a necessary party ( see CPLR 1001 [a]; 1003; Matter of Vasquez v Smith, 224 AD2d 822, 823; Matter of Regan v New York State Bd. of Elections, 207 AD2d 647, lv denied 84 NY2d 801). The petition sought a determination interpreting the State Party's rules, and such determination could have an inequitable effect on the rights of the State Party ( see Vasquez, 224 AD2d at 823). Additionally, petitioner failed to serve the Erie County Independence Party in accordance with the terms of the order to show cause ( see Matter of Rodriguez v Ward, 43 AD3d 640, 641). In view of our determination, we need not address the remaining issues raised on appeal.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Reynolds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Aug 19, 2009
65 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Dixon v. Reynolds

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LYNNE DIXON, Appellant, v. ROBERT B. REYNOLDS, JR., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Aug 19, 2009

Citations

65 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6260
883 N.Y.S.2d 747

Citing Cases

Yastrzemski v. Loftad

In Miller v. Lapine, 43 AD3d 480 (2d Dept. 2007) the petitioner's failure to name the Executive Committee of…

In the Matter of Charles Burkwit v. Olson

Supreme Court properly determined that the other candidates who appeared before the caucus for the two…