From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Pozzi

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 10, 2023
2:21-cv-02219-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02219-APG-EJY

01-10-2023

ANTOINETTE DIXON, and STEPHANIE SIMPSON, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY MICHAEL POZZI, UNITED STATES, Defendants.

HICKS & BRASIER LAW FIRM, SETH R. LITTLE, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs JASON M. FRIERSON, SKYLER H. PEARSON Attorneys for the United States


HICKS & BRASIER LAW FIRM, SETH R. LITTLE, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JASON M. FRIERSON, SKYLER H. PEARSON Attorneys for the United States

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF STEPHANIE SIMPSON'S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (SECOND REQUEST)

The parties hereby stipulate and agree, through their respective counsel of record, that due to the holidays and the continued unavailability of several federal employees knowledgeable to provide information that will assist in its response, the deadline for Defendants to file their response to Plaintiff Stephanie Simpson's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement will be extended an additional (7) days, from January 10, 2023 to January 17, 2023. The Motion was filed on December 12, 2022.

Plaintiff's reply in support of its Motion will be due January 24, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Dixon v. Pozzi

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 10, 2023
2:21-cv-02219-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Dixon v. Pozzi

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINETTE DIXON, and STEPHANIE SIMPSON, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY MICHAEL…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 10, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-02219-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 10, 2023)