From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. O'Connor

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2011
2:08-CV-01546-LDG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)

Opinion

2:08-CV-01546-LDG.

August 30, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff Daniel Steve Dixon has filed a second request for extension of time to file an opposition to Defendants Knipp, Martel, Grannis, and O'Connor's motion to dismiss (#62). Dixon requests a 14-day extension based on inadequate library access. Therefore, for good cause shown,

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff's request for extension of time to file (#62) is GRANTED. Plaintiff must file any opposition to Defendants Knipp, Martel, Grannis, and O'Connor's motion to dismiss by September 7, 2011.

Dated this 29 day of August, 2011.


Summaries of

Dixon v. O'Connor

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2011
2:08-CV-01546-LDG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Dixon v. O'Connor

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL STEVE DIXON, Plaintiff, v. J.S. O'CONNOR, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

2:08-CV-01546-LDG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)