From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 29, 2011
2:08-CV-01546-LDG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)

Opinion

2:08-CV-01546-LDG

08-29-2011

DANIEL STEVE DIXON, Plaintiff, v. J.S. O'CONNOR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Daniel Steve Dixon has filed a second request for extension of time to file an opposition to Defendants Knipp, Martel, Grannis, and O'Connor's motion to dismiss (#62). Dixon requests a 14-day extension based on inadequate library access. Therefore, for good cause shown,

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff's request for extension of time to file (#62) is GRANTED. Plaintiff must file any opposition to Defendants Knipp, Martel, Grannis, and O'Connor's motion to dismiss by September 7, 2011.

Lloyd D. George

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dixon v. O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 29, 2011
2:08-CV-01546-LDG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Dixon v. O'Connor

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL STEVE DIXON, Plaintiff, v. J.S. O'CONNOR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 29, 2011

Citations

2:08-CV-01546-LDG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2011)