From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jan 24, 2024
3:24-CV-083-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-CV-083-FDW-DCK

01-24-2024

AARON DREW DIXON, and THIENKIM TIET PHAM, Plaintiffs, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DAVID C. KEESLER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 2) filed by Helen Parsonage, concerning Ronen Sarraf, on January 24, 2024. Ronen Sarraf seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Plaintiffs. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee and information, the Court will grant the motion.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 2) is GRANTED. Ronen Sarraf is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Plaintiffs.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jan 24, 2024
3:24-CV-083-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Dixon v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:AARON DREW DIXON, and THIENKIM TIET PHAM, Plaintiffs, v. ALEJANDRO…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Jan 24, 2024

Citations

3:24-CV-083-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2024)