From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Hayes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2019
No. 2:19-cv-1156-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2:19-cv-1156-EFB P

07-31-2019

DONTAE J. DIXON, Plaintiff, v. GREG HAYES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 27, 2019, this court found that plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis failed to include a signed trust account statement as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the court directed the Clerk to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ordered plaintiff to submit the completed application and trust account statement within thirty days and warned plaintiff that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed. ECF No. 4. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not submitted the properly completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. /////

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: July 31, 2019.

/s/_________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Dixon v. Hayes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2019
No. 2:19-cv-1156-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2019)
Case details for

Dixon v. Hayes

Case Details

Full title:DONTAE J. DIXON, Plaintiff, v. GREG HAYES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 31, 2019

Citations

No. 2:19-cv-1156-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2019)