From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Groeger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Dec 1, 2017
Civil No. 2:16-cv-178-NT (D. Me. Dec. 1, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. 2:16-cv-178-NT

12-01-2017

RICHARD ALLEN DIXON, JR., Plaintiff, v. DALTON GROEGER, Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On August 2, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision. Recommended Decision (ECF No. 46). The Defendants filed their objection to the Recommended Decision on August 16, 2017 (ECF No. 47). I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision and the Defendant's objection to the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision. I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I GRANT the Defendant's motion for summary judgment on the Plaintiff's retaliation claim and DENY the Defendant's motion for summary judgment on the Plaintiff's claim under the Fourteenth Amendment.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Nancy Torresen

United States Chief District Judge Dated this 1st day of December, 2017


Summaries of

Dixon v. Groeger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Dec 1, 2017
Civil No. 2:16-cv-178-NT (D. Me. Dec. 1, 2017)
Case details for

Dixon v. Groeger

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ALLEN DIXON, JR., Plaintiff, v. DALTON GROEGER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Dec 1, 2017

Citations

Civil No. 2:16-cv-178-NT (D. Me. Dec. 1, 2017)

Citing Cases

Gomes v. US Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Magistrate Judge Nivison has consistently held that post- Kingsley, an objective standard is sufficient to…