Opinion
2:23-cv-00357-JHC
05-26-2023
RYAN ADAM DIXON, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW SCOTT GOGUEN, Defendant.
ORDER
JOHN H. CHUN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b). Dkt. # 16. The Court concludes that relief under Rule 60(b) is not appropriate because Plaintiff has not provided any new information or legal authority to support his contention that RCW 4.28.185(4) may form the basis of a negligence claim. His complaint suffers from the same legal defect that the Court articulated in its prior order dismissing the case. Dkt. # 14. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion.