Opinion
2:22-cv-01785-JHC
02-07-2023
RYAN ADAM DIXON, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW SCOTT GOGUEN, Defendant.
ORDER
JOHN H. CHUN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiff Notice and Motion for Judicial Notice.” Dkt. # 17. While the motion is noted for February 10, 2023, the Court may rule on it today, as Defendant has not filed a response. The motion presents a misapplication of Federal Rule of Evidence 201, which governs judicial notice of adjudicative facts. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion. The Court is aware that Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. And Plaintiff should understand that, with respect to issues presented in this case, the Court will seek to ascertain the applicable law.