From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Glunt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 15, 2013
12-4000 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2013)

Opinion

12-4000

02-15-2013

PAUL DIXON v. STEVEN GLUNT, et al.


CIVIL ACTION


ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2013, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Respondents' Motion, inclusive of all exhibits thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. Petitioner has not met statutory requirements to have his case heard and no reasonable jurist could find this procedural ruling debatable; thus, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

_________

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG , J.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Glunt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 15, 2013
12-4000 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Dixon v. Glunt

Case Details

Full title:PAUL DIXON v. STEVEN GLUNT, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 15, 2013

Citations

12-4000 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2013)