From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 26, 2020
Case No. 19-cv-11617 (E.D. Mich. May. 26, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 19-cv-11617

05-26-2020

DEBRA D. DIXON Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant.


David R. Grand United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER: (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE GRAND'S MARCH 23, 2020 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 17); (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 13); (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 15); (4) AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER; AND (5) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

On March 23, 2020 Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15), deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13), and affirm the findings of the Administrative Law Judge. (ECF No. 17.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 17), DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13), GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15), AFFIRMS the findings of the Commissioner, and DISMISSES Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 26, 2020

s/Paul D. Borman

Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dixon v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 26, 2020
Case No. 19-cv-11617 (E.D. Mich. May. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Dixon v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA D. DIXON Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 26, 2020

Citations

Case No. 19-cv-11617 (E.D. Mich. May. 26, 2020)

Citing Cases

Ross v. Saul

The opinions need only be 'supported by evidence in the case record.'") Helm, 405 F. App'x at 1002; see also…