From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Bokemeier

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 28, 2024
No. 23-12662 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2024)

Opinion

23-12662

03-28-2024

SAMUEL MAURICE DIXON, JR., Plaintiff, v. CHARLES BOKEMEIER, Defendant.


Anthony P. Patti Magistrate Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT

DAVID M. LAWSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presently before the Court is the report issued on March 4, 2024 by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) recommending that the Court dismiss the complaint sua sponte under the screening authority of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The deadline for filing objections to the report has passed, and no objections have been filed. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 8) is ADOPTED, and the complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Bokemeier

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 28, 2024
No. 23-12662 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Dixon v. Bokemeier

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL MAURICE DIXON, JR., Plaintiff, v. CHARLES BOKEMEIER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 28, 2024

Citations

No. 23-12662 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2024)