From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Belleque

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Sep 6, 2005
No. CV03-921-ST (D. Or. Sep. 6, 2005)

Opinion

No. CV03-921-ST.

September 6, 2005


OPINION AND ORDER


Petitioner Gregory Lee Dixon, a state prisoner, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. On May 27, 2005, the magistrate judge recommended that the petition be denied. Petitioner timely objected to this recommendation, as well as to the magistrate judge's findings that the state court's decision was not "contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law" and that petitioner failed to satisfy the requirements for a federal evidentiary hearing. This court has conducted a de novo review, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), and ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation as its own opinion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Belleque

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Sep 6, 2005
No. CV03-921-ST (D. Or. Sep. 6, 2005)
Case details for

Dixon v. Belleque

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY LEE DIXON, Petitioner, v. BRIAN E. BELLEQUE, Superintendent at…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Sep 6, 2005

Citations

No. CV03-921-ST (D. Or. Sep. 6, 2005)