From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Barrett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 21, 2013
No. 11-CV-10816 (E.D. Mich. May. 21, 2013)

Opinion

No. 11-CV-10816

05-21-2013

FREDERICK LAMAR DIXON, Petitioner, v. JOE BARRETT, Respondent.


Hon. Gerald E. Rosen


JUDGMENT


At a session of said Court, held in

the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on May 21, 2013


PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court

The Court having this date entered an Order (1) adopting the Magistrate Judge's August 4, 2010 Report and Recommendation, (2) denying Petitioner's petition for habeas corpus relief, and (3) dismissing this case,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Petitioner's petition for habeas corpus relief be, and hereby is, DENIED and accordingly, this case is DISMISSED.

Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on May 21, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Julie Owens

Case Manager, (313) 234-5135


Summaries of

Dixon v. Barrett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 21, 2013
No. 11-CV-10816 (E.D. Mich. May. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Dixon v. Barrett

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK LAMAR DIXON, Petitioner, v. JOE BARRETT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 21, 2013

Citations

No. 11-CV-10816 (E.D. Mich. May. 21, 2013)