From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1932
163 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1932)

Opinion

(Filed 23 March, 1932.)

APPEAL by plaintiffs from Small, J., at November Term, 1931, of WAKE. Affirmed.

Gulley Gulley and D. R. Jackson for plaintiffs.

Joseph B. Cheshire, Jr., for defendants.


This action was heard on the motion of the defendants that the sale of the lands described in the complaint, made by the commissioners appointed for that purpose, pursuant to a judgment, by consent, at February Term, 1930, of the Superior Court of Wake County, be confirmed.

From judgment confirming the sale and directing the commissioners to convey the lands to the purchasers, the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court.


There is no error in the judgment confirming the sale of the lands described in the complaint. The exceptions of the plaintiffs were considered and overruled. The court found that the sale was fairly conducted in all respects and that the amount bid is a fair price for the lands. The sale was confirmed by the court in its discretion. The only assignment of error is based upon an exception to the judgment. It cannot be sustained. The judgment is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1932
163 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1932)
Case details for

Dixon v. Bank

Case Details

Full title:MARY DAIL DIXON AND HER HUSBAND J. W. DIXON v. SEABOARD CITIZENS NATIONAL…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1932

Citations

163 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1932)
163 S.E. 926