From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. AVM Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 18, 1975
325 So. 2d 415 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 75-770.

July 18, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Hugh MacMillan, J.

Marjorie D. Gadarian, Jones, Paine Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Robert T. Scott, Gunster, Yoakley, Criser, Stewart Hersey, Palm Beach, and Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Johnson Hutchison, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee-AVM Corp.

Paul R. Regensdorf, Fleming, O'Bryan Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-Seaboard Surety Co.


ON MOTION TO REVIEW SUPERSEDEAS


Appellants, having filed an interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court denying their motion for change of venue, here seek appellate review of an order fixing the amount of a supersedeas bond at $50,000, pursuant to Rule 5.10, F.A.R.

Since the order of the trial court failed to specify the conditions of the bond, we are unable to determine whether the amount thereof is excessive.

Accordingly, the motion to review the order in question is denied without prejudice to future review of an appropriate order fixing the terms and conditions of a supersedeas bond.

It is so ordered.

CROSS, OWEN and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dixon v. AVM Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 18, 1975
325 So. 2d 415 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Dixon v. AVM Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LLOYD A. DIXON, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. AVM CORPORATION, AND SEABOARD…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 18, 1975

Citations

325 So. 2d 415 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)