From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Attorney General of State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 14, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0549-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0549-FCD-CMK-P.

January 14, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On December 21, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 20 days. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 21, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Respondents' motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) is granted;

3. This action is dismissed; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Attorney General of State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 14, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0549-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2008)
Case details for

Dixon v. Attorney General of State

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL VEIN DIXON, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 14, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0549-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2008)