From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville
Aug 30, 2011
NO. 2:10-CV-160 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 30, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 2:10-CV-160.

August 30, 2011


ORDER


This Social Security matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated August 18, 2011. In that Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, [Doc. 10], be granted insofar as it seeks a remand, and defendant's motion for summary judgment, [Doc. 14], be denied. The defendant has objected to the Report and Recommendation. After careful and de novo consideration of the record as a whole, including the Administrative Transcript, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons set out in that Report and Recommendation which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's objections are OVERRULED, that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Doc. 16], that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, [Doc. 10], is GRANTED insofar as it seeks a remand, and that defendant's motion for summary judgment, [Doc. 14], is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that this case is REMANDED for a consultative examination and such other and further development to fully evaluate the plaintiff's mental impairments.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville
Aug 30, 2011
NO. 2:10-CV-160 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Dixon v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL K. DIXON v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Greeneville

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

NO. 2:10-CV-160 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 30, 2011)