From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixie Rental Agency v. King

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 9, 1966
191 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 35569.

November 9, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to Florida Industrial Commission.

Summers Warden, Miami, for petitioners and cross-respondents.

Wolfson Diamond, Miami Beach, for respondent and cross-petitioner.


By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 24 May 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition for certiorari are, therefore, denied.

The petition for fees is granted and claimant's attorney is awarded a fee of $250.00.

THOMAS, Acting C.J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dixie Rental Agency v. King

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 9, 1966
191 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Dixie Rental Agency v. King

Case Details

Full title:DIXIE RENTAL AGENCY AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, PETITIONERS…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 9, 1966

Citations

191 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1966)