From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Divito v. City of Bedford Heights

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Sep 21, 2023
1:23-CV-525 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-CV-525

09-21-2023

MARTINE DIVITO, PLAINTIFF, v. CITY OF BEDFORD HEIGHTS, et al., DEFENDANTS.


ORDER

JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Upon representation of counsel and parties that the above-captioned case has been settled swbetween the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the docket be marked, "settled and dismissed with prejudice.”

Parties are to file any subsequent order setting forth different terms and conditions relative to the settlement and dismissal of the within action as directed. Any such order shall supersede this order.

FURTHER, the Court retains continuing jurisdiction to resolve disputes concerning the memorialization of this settlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994).


Summaries of

Divito v. City of Bedford Heights

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Sep 21, 2023
1:23-CV-525 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Divito v. City of Bedford Heights

Case Details

Full title:MARTINE DIVITO, PLAINTIFF, v. CITY OF BEDFORD HEIGHTS, et al., DEFENDANTS.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: Sep 21, 2023

Citations

1:23-CV-525 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2023)