From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Divita v. Arthur Court Designs, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2011
Case No. 3:2011-cv-02497-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:2011-cv-02497-MEJ

11-29-2011

TERESA DIVITA, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR COURT DESIGNS, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, Defendant.

LAW OFFICE OF PAMELA PITT PAMELA PITT, ESQ. MARIA BOURN, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff TERESA DIVITA HANSON BRIDGETT LLP JOROTHY S. LIU, ESQ. JENICA D. MARIANI, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant ARTHUR COURT DESIGNS, INC.


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [FRCP 41(a)(1)]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) with respect to all parties.

LAW OFFICE OF PAMELA PITT

PAMELA PITT, ESQ.

MARIA BOURN, ESQ.

Attorneys for Plaintiff TERESA DIVITA

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

JOROTHY S. LIU, ESQ.

JENICA D. MARIANI, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendant

ARTHUR COURT DESIGNS, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Honorable Maria-Elena James

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Divita v. Arthur Court Designs, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2011
Case No. 3:2011-cv-02497-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Divita v. Arthur Court Designs, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TERESA DIVITA, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR COURT DESIGNS, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:2011-cv-02497-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)