From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diversified Application v. A.C. Green Elec

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1996
227 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 20, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence submitted in support of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, consisting of an affidavit prepared by the plaintiff's president and various invoices which the plaintiff sent the defendant, made out a prima facie case that the defendant had failed to pay for goods it purchased from the plaintiff ( see, Diversified Application Distrib. Elec. Corp. v Northgate Elec. Corp., 227 A.D.2d 516 [decided herewith]). The unsubstantiated allegations set forth in the defendant's submissions, inter alia, to the effect that a contract did not exist between the parties, were insufficient to defeat the motion ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Diversified Application v. A.C. Green Elec

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1996
227 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Diversified Application v. A.C. Green Elec

Case Details

Full title:DIVERSIFIED APPLICATION DISTRIBUTION ELECTRICAL CORPORATION, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 385

Citing Cases

Ads Plus Advertising, Inc. v. Ault

As the communications between Cook and Alan Ault establish, Alan Ault agreed to pay for the services rendered…