From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ditto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 1, 2008
991 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4D08-915.

October 1, 2008.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2006CF001968AXX.

Rex Ditto, West Palm Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Affirmed. See Iacono v. State, 930 So.2d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (defendants are bound by the statements they make during the plea colloquy and cannot have a plea set aside by subsequently alleging that they were not truthful during plea hearing); Gidney v. State, 925 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (in postconviction proceedings, defendant cannot go behind a plea to raise issues that were known when he entered the plea).

STONE, WARNER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ditto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 1, 2008
991 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Ditto v. State

Case Details

Full title:Rex DITTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 1, 2008

Citations

991 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)