From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dittmann v. Dittmann

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 9, 1984
676 P.2d 811 (Nev. 1984)

Opinion

No. 14864

March 9, 1984

Appeal from order denying motion to modify decree of divorce, Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joseph S. Pavlikowski, Judge.

B. Mahlon Brown, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

David Abbatangelo, Las Vegas, for Respondent.


OPINION


This is an appeal from the district court's order denying appellant's motion to modify a decree of divorce. Appellant filed an opening brief, but respondent has not filed an answering brief.

On February 17, 1984, we ordered respondent to file an answering brief or show cause why her failure to file a brief should not be treated as a confession of error pursuant to NRAP 31(c). In response to our order, respondent's counsel notified this court that he "will not be filing an answering brief."

Cause appearing, we elect to treat respondent's conduct as a confession of error. NRAP 31(c); see Walport v. Walport, 98 Nev. 301, 646 P.2d 1215 (1982). Accordingly, the order of the district court is reversed, and this matter is remanded with instruction to modify the parties' decree of divorce in accordancy with appellant's motion filed below.


Summaries of

Dittmann v. Dittmann

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 9, 1984
676 P.2d 811 (Nev. 1984)
Case details for

Dittmann v. Dittmann

Case Details

Full title:GERALD DITTMANN, APPELLANT, v. SHARON DITTMANN, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Mar 9, 1984

Citations

676 P.2d 811 (Nev. 1984)
676 P.2d 811