From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dittman ex rel. Situated v. Upmc

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 12, 2017
170 A.3d 1042 (Pa. 2017)

Opinion

No. 149 WAL 2017

09-12-2017

Barbara A. DITTMAN, Gary R. Douglas, Alice Pastirik, Joann Decolati, Tina Sorrentino, Kristen Cushman and Shannon Molyneaux, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Petitioners v. UPMC d/b/a the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and UPMC McKeesport, Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners are:

a. Does an employer have a legal duty to use reasonable care to safeguard sensitive personal information of its employees when the employer chooses to store such information on an internet accessible computer system?
b. Does the economic loss doctrine permit recovery for purely pecuniary damages which result from the breach of an independent legal duty arising under common law, as opposed to the breach of a contractual duty?


Summaries of

Dittman ex rel. Situated v. Upmc

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 12, 2017
170 A.3d 1042 (Pa. 2017)
Case details for

Dittman ex rel. Situated v. Upmc

Case Details

Full title:Barbara A. DITTMAN, Gary R. Douglas, Alice Pastirik, Joann Decolati, Tina…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Sep 12, 2017

Citations

170 A.3d 1042 (Pa. 2017)