From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dittenhafer v. Citigroup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 16, 2011
No. C 10-1779 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-1779 PJH

11-16-2011

CHRIS DITTENHAFER, Plaintiff, v. CITIGROUP, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION

Before the court is the motion of plaintiff Chris Dittenhafer for an order staying the court's August 2, 2010 order compelling arbitration, pending appeal. Defendant Citigroup opposes the motion. Having read the papers filed in this case and in the pending appeal, the court finds that the motion must be DENIED.

The day before filing the present motion with this court, plaintiff filed an identical motion with the Ninth Circuit, which denied it on November 15, 2011, citing Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 (1987); California Pharmacists Ass'n v. Maxwell-Jolly, 563 F.3d 847, 849-50 (9th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the Ninth Circuit having ruled on this matter, there remains nothing for this court to decide.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dittenhafer v. Citigroup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 16, 2011
No. C 10-1779 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Dittenhafer v. Citigroup

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS DITTENHAFER, Plaintiff, v. CITIGROUP, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 16, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-1779 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2011)