From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiTommaso v. Marino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 2004
6 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-04172.

Decided April 19, 2004.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for assault, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Loughlin, J.), dated April 24, 2003, as granted the cross motion of the defendant Ben Marino for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Bracken, Margolin Gouvis, LLP, Islandia, N.Y. (Patricia M. Meisenheimer of counsel), for appellant.

John Fazzini, Huntington, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, NANCY E. SMITH, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages for assault for injuries he allegedly sustained at his workplace when he was struck by a swinging door that was pushed open by his supervisor, the defendant Ben Marino. At the time of the incident, the plaintiff and Marino were both employed by the defendant King Kullen Grocery Co., Inc. Marino established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that the plaintiff obtained Workers' Compensation benefits for his injuries. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted Marino's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him ( see Macchirole v. Giamboi, 97 N.Y.2d 147; Gagliardi v. Trapp, 221 A.D.2d 315; Mera v. Adelphi Mfg. Co., 160 A.D.2d 781; Bulis v. Di Lorenzo, 142 A.D.2d 707, 708).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiff's remaining contention.

ALTMAN, J.P., FLORIO, SMITH and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DiTommaso v. Marino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 2004
6 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

DiTommaso v. Marino

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN DiTOMMASO, appellant, v. BEN MARINO, respondent, ET AL., defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 19, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 816

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. King Kullen Gricery Co.

Accordingly, the defendants established prima facie that the exclusivity provisions of Workers' Compensation…

Campbell v. Malik

The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the motion of the defendants City of New York and New…