From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ditmars v. Smith

Supreme Court of Vermont. January Term, 1936
Feb 16, 1936
183 A. 487 (Vt. 1936)

Opinion

Opinion filed February 16, 1936.

APPEAL to county court from order of probate court allowing annual account of trustees under will. Trial by court at the September Term, 1934, Rutland County, Sturtevant, J., presiding. Judgment allowing the account. The appellants (beneficiaries) excepted. The opinion states the case. Affirmed.

Bert H. Stickney (Frank S. Norcross, of Camden, N.J., George W.C. McCarter, of Newark, N.J., and Harlan E. Cecil, of New York City, of counsel), for the appellant.

Fenton, Wing Morse for the appellees.

Present: SLACK, MOULTON, THOMPSON, and SHERBURNE, JJ., and BUTTLES, Supr. J.


This is an appeal from the same order involved in Valiquette v. Smith and Valiquette, Trustees, ante. The two appeals were heard together in the county court, and argued together here. The facts found and the issues raised in each are identical. So is the decision.

Judgment affirmed. Let the result be certified to the probate court.


Summaries of

Ditmars v. Smith

Supreme Court of Vermont. January Term, 1936
Feb 16, 1936
183 A. 487 (Vt. 1936)
Case details for

Ditmars v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:MARIE J.O. DITMARS v. HENRY G. SMITH ET AL., TRUSTEES

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont. January Term, 1936

Date published: Feb 16, 1936

Citations

183 A. 487 (Vt. 1936)
108 Vt. 130