upholding Secretary's interpretation that refusal had to meet either condition, not both conditions, for protection
Summary of this case from Koch Foods, Inc. v. Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of LaborNo. 87-3735.
May 11, 1988.
N.D.Ohio.
AFFIRMED
upholding Secretary's interpretation that refusal had to meet either condition, not both conditions, for protection
Summary of this case from Koch Foods, Inc. v. Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Labornoting that the employer's delay in payment of medical bills did not give rise to a claim of bad faith or outrageous conduct under Kentucky law
Summary of this case from The Travelers Indemnity Company v. RekerFull title:Ditmar v. Needham, Harper, Worldwide, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: May 11, 1988
Furthermore, the courts without exception have construed § 522(b)(2)(A) to mean that in order for a debtor to…
Zingale v. Kijakaziat *28-29 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2017) (quotingDe Moss v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 189,…