Summary
holding that sovereign immunity protects a Commonwealth employee acting within the scope of his duties from liability for intentional acts which cause emotional distress
Summary of this case from Pennington v. SwisherOpinion
1992
holding that sovereign immunity protects a Commonwealth employee acting within the scope of his duties from liability for intentional acts which cause emotional distress
Summary of this case from Pennington v. Swisher1992
holding that sovereign immunity protects a Commonwealth employee acting within the scope of his duties from liability for intentional acts which cause emotional distress
Summary of this case from Pennington v. SwisherFull title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
In Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 109 S.Ct. 2304, 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989), the…
Vanderpool v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleVanderpool does not cite to any statute, regulation, or caselaw which mandates that the Board ignore its…