From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 1, 1997
173 Ill. 2d 525 (Ill. 1997)

Opinion

1997.


(83075) Harris v. Central Illinois Light Co. Rule 23 Order No. 3-96-0398, filed 03/10/97 ............................. Denied.

(82966) Hill v. Ryan Rule 23 Order No. 1-95-1558, filed 06/14/96 ............................. Denied.

(82880) Holladay v. Boyd No. 1-95-2896, filed 12/30/96 .............. Denied.

(82899, 82909) Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce Comm'n No. 3-96-0555, filed 02/06/97 .............. Denied.

(82886) In re C.D.K. Rule 23 Order No. 4-96-0450, filed 01/22/97 ............................. Denied.

(82238) In re H.R. No. 4-96-0206, filed 10/07/96 ... Denied with order.

In the exercise of this court's supervisory authority, the judgment of the Appellate Court, Fourth District, in cause No. 4- 96-0206 is vacated. The appellate court is directed to reconsider its judgment in light of In re S.G., 175 Ill.2d 471 (1997).

(82998) In re R.N. Rule 23 Order No. 1-96-0762, filed 02/24/97 ............................. Denied.

(82785) In re Ti. W. Rule 23 Order No. 5-96-0176, filed 12/05/96 ............................. Denied.

(83109) In re V.O. Rule 23 Order No. 3-95-0835, filed 03/21/97 ............................. Denied.

(82986) J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Havens Steel Co. Rule 23 Order No. 1-95-1122, filed 01/10/97 ............................. Denied.

(83089) Knowles v. Lewis, Blickhan, Longlett Timmerwilke Rule 23 Order No. 4-96-0504, filed 03/11/97 ............................. Denied.


Summaries of

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 1, 1997
173 Ill. 2d 525 (Ill. 1997)
Case details for

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Illinois

Date published: Jan 1, 1997

Citations

173 Ill. 2d 525 (Ill. 1997)

Citing Cases

In Re: D.E

S.G., 175 Ill.2d at 483, 677 N.E.2d at 926. Three dissenting justices repudiated the majority's narrow…