From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 1, 2001
195 Ill. 2d 576 (Ill. 2001)

Opinion

2001.


JUNE 2001 (91564) Carpetland U.S.A., Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment Security 319 Ill. App.3d 1068 Allowed. (91409) Carr v. Cook County Hospital Rule 23 Order No. 1-99-4374, filed 03/23/01 Denied. (91527) Carr v. Servicemaster Industries, Inc. Rule 23 Order No. 1-00-0573, filed 02/23/01 Denied. (91293) Cave v. Honeywell, Inc. Rule 23 Order No. 4-00-0198, filed 03/01/01 Denied. (91401) Commons v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund Rule 23 Order No. 2-99-1443, filed 01/30/01 Denied. (91596) Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce Comm'n Miscellaneous Order No. 2-01-0038, filed 05/15/01 Denied with order. In the exercise of this court's supervisory authority, the Appellate Court, Second District, is directed to vacate its order of April 19, 2001, dismissing appeal No. 2-01-0038 filed by Commonwealth Edison Company on January 12, 2001. (91515) Cushman v. Korando Rule 23 Order No. 5-99-0594, filed 03/22/01 Denied. (91611) Department of Human Services v. Luedtke Miscellaneous Order No. 3-00-0691, filed 03/15/01 Denied. (91468) Devoney v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity Benefit Fund No. 1-99-1383, filed 03/26/01 Denied. (McMorrow, J., took no part.)

Summaries of

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 1, 2001
195 Ill. 2d 576 (Ill. 2001)
Case details for

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Illinois

Date published: Jan 1, 2001

Citations

195 Ill. 2d 576 (Ill. 2001)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission

In an order entered on April 19, 2001, this court dismissed ComEd's appeal in No. 2-01-0038, finding that we…

AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment Security

In applying this standard, our appellate court, including the appellate court panel in this case, has…