Summary
holding that a "mere recommendation or statement of opinion ordinarily cannot be the basis of a cause of action for fraud"
Summary of this case from Staton v. BrameOpinion
1999
holding that a "mere recommendation or statement of opinion ordinarily cannot be the basis of a cause of action for fraud"
Summary of this case from Staton v. Brame1999
holding that a "mere recommendation or statement of opinion ordinarily cannot be the basis of a cause of action for fraud"
Summary of this case from Staton v. BrameFull title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1999
Leftwich v. Gaines, 134 N.C.App. 502, 509–10, 521 S.E.2d 717, 723,disc. rev. denied,351 N.C. 357, 541 S.E.2d…
Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of CaryIf a petitioner contends the Board's decision was based on an error of law, de novo review is proper. JWL…