Summary
noting that even if evidence is admissible under Rule 404(b), it must still be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of undue prejudice
Summary of this case from State v. JohnsonOpinion
2001
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2001
554 S.E.2d 647 (N.C. 2001)
Summaries of
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2001
554 S.E.2d 647 (N.C. 2001)
noting that even if evidence is admissible under Rule 404(b), it must still be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of undue prejudice
Summary of this case from State v. JohnsonCase details for
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 2001
Citations
554 S.E.2d 647 (N.C. 2001)
354 N.C. 222
Citing Cases
State v. Wooten
"`Once the trial court determines evidence is properly admissible under Rule 404(b), it must still determine…
State v. TuckerIt is well settled that "[w]hether or not to declare a mistrial is a matter within the sound discretion of…