Summary
finding that "the Habitual Felons Act used in conjunction with structured sentencing did not violate the defendant's double jeopardy protections"
Summary of this case from State v. WestmorelandOpinion
2001
finding that "the Habitual Felons Act used in conjunction with structured sentencing did not violate the defendant's double jeopardy protections"
Summary of this case from State v. Westmoreland2001
finding that "the Habitual Felons Act used in conjunction with structured sentencing did not violate the defendant's double jeopardy protections"
Summary of this case from State v. WestmorelandFull title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 2001
On cross-examination, impeachment of a witness is proper if it "merely inquires into prior inconsistent…
State v. WilliamsThis specific argument has likewise been rejected. See State v. Brown, 146 N.C. App. 299, 301, 552 S.E.2d…