From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 31, 2002
355 N.C. 214 (N.C. 2002)

Opinion


560 S.E.2d 133 (N.C. 2002) 355 N.C. 214 Margaret Williams PITTS, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, American Security Insurance Group, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and Wachovia Bank of North Carolina, N.A. No. 369PA01. Supreme Court of North Carolina Jan. 31, 2002.

        Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Raleigh, Reid C. Adams, Jr., Hada V. Haulsee, John J. Bowers, Winston-Salem, for Wachovia Banks of NC, N.A.

        Carl N. Patterson, Jr., Donald H. Tucker, Melinda S. Dumeer, Raleigh, for American Security Insurance Co. & Standard Guaranty Insurance Co.

        Marvin K. Blount, Jr., Darren M. Dawson, Greenville, for Margaret Williams Pitts.

        Edward C. Winslow, III, Clinton R. Pinyan, Greensboro, for N.C. Bankers Association.

        Rhoda Billings, John M. Conley, Russell M. Robinson, II, Charlotte, for N.C. Citizens for Business and Industry.

        Prior report: 144 N.C.App. 1, 550 S.E.2d 179.

        ORDER

        Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants (American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and Wachovia Bank of N.C., N.A.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st day of January 2002."

        Defendants shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

        Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

        Justice EDMUNDS recused.


Summaries of

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 31, 2002
355 N.C. 214 (N.C. 2002)
Case details for

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 31, 2002

Citations

355 N.C. 214 (N.C. 2002)
355 N.C. 214
560 S.E.2d 132

Citing Cases

Wynn v. United Health Serv./Two Rivers Health–trent Campus

[MMI], which does not include these other aspects of disability as defined by the Workers' Compensation Act,…

Wynn v. United Health Services

[MMI], which does not include these other aspects of disability as defined by the Workers' Compensation Act,…