Summary
holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause applies to juvenile proceedings and attaches when the judge, as trier of fact, begins to hear evidence in the adjudication
Summary of this case from In re W.G.COpinion
1998
holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause applies to juvenile proceedings and attaches when the judge, as trier of fact, begins to hear evidence in the adjudication
Summary of this case from In re W.G.C1998
holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause applies to juvenile proceedings and attaches when the judge, as trier of fact, begins to hear evidence in the adjudication
Summary of this case from In re W.G.Cfinding no custodial interrogation where a high school assistant principal “did not question the juvenile to obtain information to use in criminal proceedings but questioned her simply for school disciplinary purposes”
Summary of this case from In re R.B.L.Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
(3) the possession was recently after the larceny, mere possession of stolen property being insufficient to…
State v. PughA careful review of the record reveals that the trial court's finding was supported by competent evidence.…