Summary
holding that a motion under Rule 12(b) to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is interlocutory and not immediately appealable
Summary of this case from Marvin v. MarvinOpinion
2000
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2000
351 N.C. 352 (N.C. 2000)
Summaries of
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2000
351 N.C. 352 (N.C. 2000)
holding that a motion under Rule 12(b) to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is interlocutory and not immediately appealable
Summary of this case from Marvin v. MarvinCase details for
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 2000
Citations
351 N.C. 352 (N.C. 2000)
Citing Cases
Yang v. Three Springs, Inc.
GMC Trucks v. Smith, 249 N.C. 764, 766, 107 S.E.2d 746, 748-49 (1959); see also Country Club of Johnston…
Wilson v. TaylorGenerally, an order denying a motion to dismiss is not immediately appealable as it is interlocutory in…